For Questions That Don't Have One Right Answer.
Some craft questions benefit from three perspectives instead of one. Councils run multi-round debates between three specialist agents — each with their own personality traits and domain expertise — while you read the back-and-forth and decide. World, Character, and Creative councils are included. You're the one making the call, though. The council just does the arguing.
Three Councils, Three Domains
Each council is shaped around a different kind of question. You ask, three agents argue, you read the debate and decide what (if anything) to do with it.
World Council
Three default members: the Archivist (lore consistency), the Worldsmith (creative vision), and the Scholar (research and logic). Takes worldbuilding questions — geography, politics, magic systems, cultural drift — and argues them from three angles.
Character Council
For character decisions. Motivations, arcs, relationships, dialogue authenticity. Ask "would this character really do this?" and the council gives you three argued answers instead of one confident wrong one.
Creative Council
For the questions that don't fit a single domain. Plot direction, tonal shifts, structural experiments. The members argue for different creative approaches, citing evidence from what you've already written.
Members & Personality Traits
Every council member has five personality traits on a 0–100 scale. These shape how they argue, what they focus on, and how they interact with other members during debates.
| Trait | Range | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Creativity | 0–100 | Higher values produce more unconventional ideas and unexpected connections |
| Detail | 0–100 | Controls depth of analysis — high detail means exhaustive exploration |
| Formality | 0–100 | Shapes tone from casual brainstorming to scholarly discourse |
| Collaboration | 0–100 | How much a member builds on others' ideas vs. challenges them |
| Risk-Taking | 0–100 | Willingness to propose bold, potentially controversial positions |
- The Archivist
- High detail, high formality, low risk-taking. The voice of established canon. Challenges any proposal that contradicts existing lore and demands evidence for changes.
- The Worldsmith
- High creativity, high risk-taking, moderate collaboration. The creative visionary. Proposes bold ideas and builds on what others suggest, pushing boundaries while respecting structure.
- The Scholar
- High detail, moderate formality, high collaboration. The researcher. Grounds discussions in logic, historical precedent, and systematic analysis. Asks "but does this actually work?"
Multi-Round Streaming Debates
The debate unfolds live. Each member's response streams into its own bubble as it comes in, with arguments, evidence, and counterpoints appearing where you can watch the reasoning develop.
- Real-Time Response Bubbles
- Each council member gets a color-coded bubble. You watch them react to each other across NDJSON streaming events, which means you can stop reading the moment the argument stops being useful to you.
- Multi-Round Flow
- Debates aren't single-shot. Members respond to each other across multiple rounds, building on arguments, conceding points where the other side has a stronger case, and refining positions.
- Session Management
- Start, monitor, and cancel debates. Track progress through rounds with streaming status updates. Resume or review past sessions whenever you want to revisit the reasoning.
- Debate History
- Every debate is saved with the full session attached — member responses, round progression, the final recommendation each side landed on. Useful for tracing how your thinking on a question evolved over time.
What Comes Out the Other Side
Debates produce artifacts you can act on. Every one of them is a proposal, though. You review, edit, accept, or throw it out. The canon is yours.
Proposed Lore Entries
When the debate lands on a conclusion that would benefit from being in the Legendry, the council drafts a proposal entry. Each one has a status — draft, reviewing, accepted, rejected — and nothing enters your canon until you explicitly accept it.
Council Reports
HTML-rendered summaries of the debate. Key points, areas of agreement, unresolved tensions, the recommendation each side landed on. A decision document you can read in two minutes, so the debate itself stays a resource you revisit rather than a transcript you have to wade through.
Research Markers
Council members can flag topics that need deeper investigation with [RESEARCH: query] markers. These trigger extra lore retrieval in the next round, so the debate can get more specific as it goes.
Custom Members & Configuration
The default members are starting points. Tune their personalities, add new members whose expertise your world specifically needs, or override their system prompts entirely when the preset doesn't match the debate you're actually trying to have.
- Custom Members
- Build your own council members with specific domain expertise, personality traits, and behavioral guidelines. A military strategist, a theologian, a merchant captain — whoever fits the question you're wrestling with.
- Personality Tuning
- Adjust the five personality sliders per member, per council. Turn the Scholar's risk-taking up for an experimental session. Dial the Worldsmith's creativity down when you want a continuity-focused review instead of a brainstorm.
- System Prompt Override
- Full control over each member's system prompt. Define how they approach a debate, what they prioritize, and what perspective they represent. Useful when you want a deliberately contrarian member, or one who only answers from the perspective of a specific faction.